Skip to main content

Abstraction --- Infinite can live in finite (1)

Japanese version

Here I would like to remind you about abstraction. Abstraction derives a common idea that is not associated with any specific instance from many ideas associated with instances. Because this blog is oriented to ``getting a feeling of understanding,'' I need to explain the motivation, ``why we should need to mention about abstraction?'' We introduced the idea, abstraction, because concrete instances are not sufficient. If someone can understand about what is the addition, s/he can add a pair of numbers out from infinite combination of numbers. Because any memory devices have a limit in size, there is a limit to add the numbers in finite combination. It is a strong idea that understanding we can add any number.

We could design a machine that seems compute numbers by memorize the answers. This is a different approach to make machine to compute. We could teach 1 + 1 equals 2, 1 + 2 equals 3. Then if you ask this machine, what is 1 + 2? Then you can ask to the machine, what is 2 + 3. The machine can not answer the question since the machine has not memorized that answer for a long time. This is why remembering each instance is not sufficient.

We could abstract 1, 2, 3, ... as a concept ``numbers.'' We could design a machine which process ``numbers.'' This means a machine can treat infinite kind of number instances.

Here infinity means, we can add ``any number'' which is quite normal. 1+10 is possible, but it should not happens that 1 + 128 is not possible. Sometimes, I encounter a person who think that ``nothing can do on infinity.'' However, you can chose one number from infinite numbers and you can add it with one. It might be possible your choice is too large and you can not say that number in your life time. However, you know you can add any two numbers.

I personally think that the most important subject in the high school mathematics is differentiation and integration. It has an idea, ``Infinite can live in finite.'' You can see this through the concept called convergence. For example, there are infinite number of numbers between zero to one. We can project and create one to one mapping from an infinite plane to hemi-sphere with radius one except one point. Pythagoras thought infinite can not live in finite, Zenon made a famous paradox to indicate Pythagoras's mistake.

We could think about infinite numbers by an abstraction of number itself. This is a strong idea. In lambda calculus, we abstract functions with three definitions. All three definitions are about functions. Thanks to abstraction, we can handle any functions in lambda calculus --- infinite type of functions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why parallelogram area is |ad-bc|?

Here is my question. The area of parallelogram is the difference of these two rectangles (red rectangle - blue rectangle). This is not intuitive for me. If you also think it is not so intuitive, you might interested in my slides. I try to explain this for hight school students. Slides:  A bit intuitive (for me) explanation of area of parallelogram  (to my site, external link) . 

Geometric Multiplicity: eignvectors (2)

If eigenvectors of a matrix A are independent, it is a happy property. Because the matrix A can be diagonalized with a matrix S that column vectors are eigenvectors of A . For example, Why this is a happy property of A? Because I can find A's power easily. A^{10} is not a big deal. Because Λ is a diagonal matrix and power of a diagonal matrix is quite simple. A^{10} = SΛ^{10} S^{-1} Then, why if I want to compute power of A ? That is the same reason to find eigenvectors. Eigenvectors are a basis of a matrix. A matrix can be represented by a single scalar. I repeat this again. This is the happy point, a matrix becomes a scalar. What can be simpler than a scalar value. But, this is only possible when the matrix S's columns are independent. Because S^{-1} must be exist. Now I come back to my first question. Is the λ's multiplicity related with the number of eigenvectors? This time I found this has the name. Geometric multiplicity (GM): the number of in...

Tezuka Osamu's Black Jack, "Shrinking"

I like several novel authors. My first favorite author is probably Teduka, Osamu. I still love him. The list grows by adding Hoshi, Shinichi, Agatha Christie, Hermann Hesse, and so forth. My first favorite article of Tezuka was Atom as most of the (boy's) Tezuka fans did. But my favorite is Black Jack. I try to summarize one story, it is still quite vivid in my memory. I first read this story when I was 13 - 15 years old. I re-read it at least several times since Black Jack is composed of many short episodes. The title should be "ちぢむ (SHRINKING)" or it might be "縮む(Shrinking)". (It is not so convenient to translate this to English, since English does not have a system to say the exact same word in several ways. So I just simulate it with capital letters.) Black Jack is a genius surgeon, but he does not have the license. In short, his medical activity is illegal. His skill is top level in the world, but, the fee is also out-of-law expensive. In the story ...