Skip to main content

Progress in three months


I first met C three months ago. I teach her one digit plus, like 3+4. One digit plus is somewhat OK for her, but, two digits were hard to her.  If I taught slowly, she could do it. However, next week she glanced at the same problem, then she said ``Geht's nicht (Can't be!)' and she immediately gave up. The whole month was like that. I thought, ``I see, she is a tough one.''

I told her every time, ``Mathematics is a language. It is a reflection of human mind. Maybe this doesn't make sense for you, but, it's a language. Which means there is a meaning of all of them. So what does it mean 3+4?'' One day, I used a drawing, the other day, I used a block to explain the numbers and plus. I try to show that we can touch the numbers. However, what she wanted know was the answers of her homework. Once she cried that she needed to fill the homework until tomorrow. I felt sorry a bit, but, I said ``The answer is not important. Your understanding is important.'' One point I know her school demands or expects that Hasenshule helps her homework. I am a useless teacher who doesn't tell the homework answers. But I believe it doesn't matter that something is just written on the paper. I believe it is more important she can understand something. So, I continue to be useless.  She once left my class and asked to help the homework to another teacher.

She has already been in Hasenshule for two years. It seems she is always like that. However, recent two or three weeks, she has changed. Last week, I asked her what is equal to 802-456? She first said, 2 - 6 geht's nicht. But she still looked on the paper. Then she put 1 under the 5, then said 12 - 6 = 6. I thought, it doesn't work. But, I just watched how she continue. It looked like she did:
802 - 456 = 800 + 12 - (450 + 6).     ... (1)
This is not correct, it should be:
802 - 456 = 790 + 12 - (450 + 6).     ... (2)
So, I expected she made a mistake. But actually, she did:
802 - 456 = 800 + 12 - (450 + 6) - 10.  ... (3)
This is correct. I didn't understand what she did, so I asked her how to compute this. It was hard that she first could not explain it to me. But, a few minuted later she explained she computed like (3). I asked, ``What you did is completely correct. By the way, how do you think the method (1)?'' I explained the method (1). Unfortunately, she didn't get it. I saw the method (3)'s advantage. In this problem, when I calculated the 1's position, the 100's position was also changed. But, the method (3) didn't change the 100's position. The method seemed more complicated, but, I realized there was an advantage. She solved the rest of all the problems by her method.

I didn't know this method. I learned a new thing that day, she showed the great progress.

Yesterday, she said ``Geht's nicht'' again to the same problem she solved in the last week. However, now I know she can do it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why parallelogram area is |ad-bc|?

Here is my question. The area of parallelogram is the difference of these two rectangles (red rectangle - blue rectangle). This is not intuitive for me. If you also think it is not so intuitive, you might interested in my slides. I try to explain this for hight school students. Slides:  A bit intuitive (for me) explanation of area of parallelogram  (to my site, external link) . 

Geometric Multiplicity: eignvectors (2)

If eigenvectors of a matrix A are independent, it is a happy property. Because the matrix A can be diagonalized with a matrix S that column vectors are eigenvectors of A . For example, Why this is a happy property of A? Because I can find A's power easily. A^{10} is not a big deal. Because Λ is a diagonal matrix and power of a diagonal matrix is quite simple. A^{10} = SΛ^{10} S^{-1} Then, why if I want to compute power of A ? That is the same reason to find eigenvectors. Eigenvectors are a basis of a matrix. A matrix can be represented by a single scalar. I repeat this again. This is the happy point, a matrix becomes a scalar. What can be simpler than a scalar value. But, this is only possible when the matrix S's columns are independent. Because S^{-1} must be exist. Now I come back to my first question. Is the λ's multiplicity related with the number of eigenvectors? This time I found this has the name. Geometric multiplicity (GM): the number of in...

Tezuka Osamu's Black Jack, "Shrinking"

I like several novel authors. My first favorite author is probably Teduka, Osamu. I still love him. The list grows by adding Hoshi, Shinichi, Agatha Christie, Hermann Hesse, and so forth. My first favorite article of Tezuka was Atom as most of the (boy's) Tezuka fans did. But my favorite is Black Jack. I try to summarize one story, it is still quite vivid in my memory. I first read this story when I was 13 - 15 years old. I re-read it at least several times since Black Jack is composed of many short episodes. The title should be "ちぢむ (SHRINKING)" or it might be "縮む(Shrinking)". (It is not so convenient to translate this to English, since English does not have a system to say the exact same word in several ways. So I just simulate it with capital letters.) Black Jack is a genius surgeon, but he does not have the license. In short, his medical activity is illegal. His skill is top level in the world, but, the fee is also out-of-law expensive. In the story ...