Skip to main content

Hasenschule: A girl who invented a matrix.


I have a fun to teach C. Six months ago, she had a problem of one digit plus and minus. She often cried in my class. But now she can calculate three digits plus and minus.

One day, she was solving a question shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. The question.
I expected the answer as shown in Figure 2. If she could do it, I would be happy.
Figure 2. Expected answer.
While I looked other students, she worked on the problem. I just walked next to her, and what I saw was, my god, a matrix! (Figure 3)
Figure 3. A matrix is invented.
I asked her, ``Wait a moment! Did you do this alone?'' she answered me ``Yes, I did. It is not correct?''

It doesn't matter. The correctness of the calculation doesn't matter. I was astonished that she organized the answer like this. I could see two vectors in the original question, but both numbers are written in the horizontal direction. She rearranged one of a set of horizontal numbers to the vertical direction and put the operator '+' at the top left. Then she filled the matrix.

This is a reasonable notation. Figure 4 shows how many repetition are there in Figure 2. Each number is repeated three times, the `+', `-', and `=' are repeated nine times.
Figure 4. Unnecessary duplication.
The upper matrix in Figure 3, the operator `+' is shown up only once, at the top left. Because all the operators are `+'. But she has not removed since the bottom figure uses the different operator `-'. She didn't write `=' at all. This is great, if she removed the `+' or `-' operator, then we cannot see which operator is used. But `=' is always use, so removing that makes no misunderstanding. She wrote this in a minimal and sufficient way.

Moreover, there is no repeated number in Figure 3. Again she wrote minimal and sufficient information. People may make a mistake when they copied anything by hand. The mathematical notation has been developed for long time and I think the matrix form is one of the most compact and sophisticated form. If you use some spreadsheet software (e.g., Excel), you know a spreadsheet is a powerful notation. It is much easier than Figure 2 form.

She might see this form. But even so, she knows how to use it and when to use it. It seems it was so natural to her to organize this calculation in this way. I was moved. I usually don't give a gold point, but, this time, I felt the gold point is for this. I told her she did so great. She might not understand this since it is just natural to her. I hope one day she will understand more deeply what she did today.

One thing I am afraid is that someone think this is too advance to her and say that the answer should be like in Figure 2.

Today, I was surprised and moved. I was happy that I saw children do mathematics so freely.

The PDF version is here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why A^{T}A is invertible? (2) Linear Algebra

Why A^{T}A has the inverse Let me explain why A^{T}A has the inverse, if the columns of A are independent. First, if a matrix is n by n, and all the columns are independent, then this is a square full rank matrix. Therefore, there is the inverse. So, the problem is when A is a m by n, rectangle matrix.  Strang's explanation is based on null space. Null space and column space are the fundamental of the linear algebra. This explanation is simple and clear. However, when I was a University student, I did not recall the explanation of the null space in my linear algebra class. Maybe I was careless. I regret that... Explanation based on null space This explanation is based on Strang's book. Column space and null space are the main characters. Let's start with this explanation. Assume  x  where x is in the null space of A .  The matrices ( A^{T} A ) and A share the null space as the following: This means, if x is in the null space of A , x is also in the null spa

Gauss's quote for positive, negative, and imaginary number

Recently I watched the following great videos about imaginary numbers by Welch Labs. https://youtu.be/T647CGsuOVU?list=PLiaHhY2iBX9g6KIvZ_703G3KJXapKkNaF I like this article about naming of math by Kalid Azad. https://betterexplained.com/articles/learning-tip-idea-name/ Both articles mentioned about Gauss, who suggested to use other names of positive, negative, and imaginary numbers. Gauss wrote these names are wrong and that is one of the reason people didn't get why negative times negative is positive, or, pure positive imaginary times pure positive imaginary is negative real number. I made a few videos about explaining why -1 * -1 = +1, too. Explanation: why -1 * -1 = +1 by pattern https://youtu.be/uD7JRdAzKP8 Explanation: why -1 * -1 = +1 by climbing a mountain https://youtu.be/uD7JRdAzKP8 But actually Gauss's insight is much powerful. The original is in the Gauß, Werke, Bd. 2, S. 178 . Hätte man +1, -1, √-1) nicht positiv, negative, imaginäre (oder gar um

Why parallelogram area is |ad-bc|?

Here is my question. The area of parallelogram is the difference of these two rectangles (red rectangle - blue rectangle). This is not intuitive for me. If you also think it is not so intuitive, you might interested in my slides. I try to explain this for hight school students. Slides:  A bit intuitive (for me) explanation of area of parallelogram  (to my site, external link) .