Skip to main content

Hasenschule: A girl who invented a matrix.


I have a fun to teach C. Six months ago, she had a problem of one digit plus and minus. She often cried in my class. But now she can calculate three digits plus and minus.

One day, she was solving a question shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. The question.
I expected the answer as shown in Figure 2. If she could do it, I would be happy.
Figure 2. Expected answer.
While I looked other students, she worked on the problem. I just walked next to her, and what I saw was, my god, a matrix! (Figure 3)
Figure 3. A matrix is invented.
I asked her, ``Wait a moment! Did you do this alone?'' she answered me ``Yes, I did. It is not correct?''

It doesn't matter. The correctness of the calculation doesn't matter. I was astonished that she organized the answer like this. I could see two vectors in the original question, but both numbers are written in the horizontal direction. She rearranged one of a set of horizontal numbers to the vertical direction and put the operator '+' at the top left. Then she filled the matrix.

This is a reasonable notation. Figure 4 shows how many repetition are there in Figure 2. Each number is repeated three times, the `+', `-', and `=' are repeated nine times.
Figure 4. Unnecessary duplication.
The upper matrix in Figure 3, the operator `+' is shown up only once, at the top left. Because all the operators are `+'. But she has not removed since the bottom figure uses the different operator `-'. She didn't write `=' at all. This is great, if she removed the `+' or `-' operator, then we cannot see which operator is used. But `=' is always use, so removing that makes no misunderstanding. She wrote this in a minimal and sufficient way.

Moreover, there is no repeated number in Figure 3. Again she wrote minimal and sufficient information. People may make a mistake when they copied anything by hand. The mathematical notation has been developed for long time and I think the matrix form is one of the most compact and sophisticated form. If you use some spreadsheet software (e.g., Excel), you know a spreadsheet is a powerful notation. It is much easier than Figure 2 form.

She might see this form. But even so, she knows how to use it and when to use it. It seems it was so natural to her to organize this calculation in this way. I was moved. I usually don't give a gold point, but, this time, I felt the gold point is for this. I told her she did so great. She might not understand this since it is just natural to her. I hope one day she will understand more deeply what she did today.

One thing I am afraid is that someone think this is too advance to her and say that the answer should be like in Figure 2.

Today, I was surprised and moved. I was happy that I saw children do mathematics so freely.

The PDF version is here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Geometric Multiplicity: eignvectors (2)

If eigenvectors of a matrix A are independent, it is a happy property. Because the matrix A can be diagonalized with a matrix S that column vectors are eigenvectors of A . For example, Why this is a happy property of A? Because I can find A's power easily. A^{10} is not a big deal. Because Λ is a diagonal matrix and power of a diagonal matrix is quite simple. A^{10} = SΛ^{10} S^{-1} Then, why if I want to compute power of A ? That is the same reason to find eigenvectors. Eigenvectors are a basis of a matrix. A matrix can be represented by a single scalar. I repeat this again. This is the happy point, a matrix becomes a scalar. What can be simpler than a scalar value. But, this is only possible when the matrix S's columns are independent. Because S^{-1} must be exist. Now I come back to my first question. Is the λ's multiplicity related with the number of eigenvectors? This time I found this has the name. Geometric multiplicity (GM): the number of in...

Gauss's quote for positive, negative, and imaginary number

Recently I watched the following great videos about imaginary numbers by Welch Labs. https://youtu.be/T647CGsuOVU?list=PLiaHhY2iBX9g6KIvZ_703G3KJXapKkNaF I like this article about naming of math by Kalid Azad. https://betterexplained.com/articles/learning-tip-idea-name/ Both articles mentioned about Gauss, who suggested to use other names of positive, negative, and imaginary numbers. Gauss wrote these names are wrong and that is one of the reason people didn't get why negative times negative is positive, or, pure positive imaginary times pure positive imaginary is negative real number. I made a few videos about explaining why -1 * -1 = +1, too. Explanation: why -1 * -1 = +1 by pattern https://youtu.be/uD7JRdAzKP8 Explanation: why -1 * -1 = +1 by climbing a mountain https://youtu.be/uD7JRdAzKP8 But actually Gauss's insight is much powerful. The original is in the Gauß, Werke, Bd. 2, S. 178 . Hätte man +1, -1, √-1) nicht positiv, negative, imaginäre (oder gar um...

Tezuka Osamu's Black Jack, "Shrinking"

I like several novel authors. My first favorite author is probably Teduka, Osamu. I still love him. The list grows by adding Hoshi, Shinichi, Agatha Christie, Hermann Hesse, and so forth. My first favorite article of Tezuka was Atom as most of the (boy's) Tezuka fans did. But my favorite is Black Jack. I try to summarize one story, it is still quite vivid in my memory. I first read this story when I was 13 - 15 years old. I re-read it at least several times since Black Jack is composed of many short episodes. The title should be "ちぢむ (SHRINKING)" or it might be "縮む(Shrinking)". (It is not so convenient to translate this to English, since English does not have a system to say the exact same word in several ways. So I just simulate it with capital letters.) Black Jack is a genius surgeon, but he does not have the license. In short, his medical activity is illegal. His skill is top level in the world, but, the fee is also out-of-law expensive. In the story ...