Skip to main content

Vector projection and directional cosine


Abstract

When I compute something, I see it is correct, but sometimes my intuition doesn't work. Especially, I am not good at statistics, though, sometimes I don't see geometry also. I can show you such example this time.

Vector projection and directional cosine

My friend Dietger asked me a problem. Figure 1 shows the problem. Let \(\mathbf{h}'\) is a projected vector of \(\mathbf{h}\) on the \(\mathbf{e}_1,\mathbf{e}_2\) plane of an orthogonal coordinate system. Where \(\mathbf{h}\) is an arbitrary unit vector. Let \(\mathbf{h}_1\) is the projection of \(\mathbf{h}\) on the axis \(\mathbf{e}_1\). Then show
\[
 \cos \alpha = |\mathbf{h}'| \cos \phi.
\]
It's intuitively odd for me that there is a length ratio \(h'\) between \(\cos \alpha\) and \( \cos \phi\).
Figure 1. Two projections of an unit vector \(\mathbf{h}\).

However, these are projections, therefore some \(\cos\)  relationships. Let's start with  \(\mathbf{h}_1\).  \(\mathbf{h}_1\) is a projection of  \(\mathbf{h}\) on \(\mathbf{e}_1\) axis,
\begin{eqnarray*}
 |\mathbf{h}_1| &=&  \mathbf{h}\cdot\mathbf{e}_1\\
 &=& |\mathbf{h}| |\mathbf{e}_1| \cos \alpha \\
 &=& \cos \alpha.
\end{eqnarray*}
If you noticed \(\mathbf{h}_1\) is a projection of \(\mathbf{h}'\) on \(\mathbf{e}_1\) axis,
\begin{eqnarray*}
 \mathbf{h}'\cdot\mathbf{e}_1 &=& |\mathbf{h}'||\mathbf{e}_1| \cos \phi \\
 &=& |\mathbf{h}'| \cos \phi.
\end{eqnarray*}
This is actually \(|\mathbf{h}_1|\). See the Figure 2. Therefore,
\begin{eqnarray*}
 \cos \alpha &=& |\mathbf{h}'| \cos \phi.
\end{eqnarray*}
Figure 2. The relationship among \(\mathbf{h} \), \(\mathbf{h}'\) and \(\mathbf{h}_1\).
In the end, if you noticed \(\mathbf{h}_1\) is a direct projection of \(\mathbf{h}\) or projection of projection, there is no mystery here.

When I understand this problem as above, I recall directional cosine.  I learned this long time ago, but this idea is located nowhere in my head and no connection with other mathematical ideas. I just remember the squared sum of the cosines becomes 1. It's a kind of left out idea for me. But, if the projection is on the each axis, this is directional cosine. Then the squared sum is of course one. (Or the square root of squared sum is one. But square root of one is anyway one.) Because this is the length of unit vector, which is one. It's so simple. I don't know why I never realize the directional cosine is just coordinate elements of unit vector.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why parallelogram area is |ad-bc|?

Here is my question. The area of parallelogram is the difference of these two rectangles (red rectangle - blue rectangle). This is not intuitive for me. If you also think it is not so intuitive, you might interested in my slides. I try to explain this for hight school students. Slides:  A bit intuitive (for me) explanation of area of parallelogram  (to my site, external link) . 

Geometric Multiplicity: eignvectors (2)

If eigenvectors of a matrix A are independent, it is a happy property. Because the matrix A can be diagonalized with a matrix S that column vectors are eigenvectors of A . For example, Why this is a happy property of A? Because I can find A's power easily. A^{10} is not a big deal. Because Λ is a diagonal matrix and power of a diagonal matrix is quite simple. A^{10} = SΛ^{10} S^{-1} Then, why if I want to compute power of A ? That is the same reason to find eigenvectors. Eigenvectors are a basis of a matrix. A matrix can be represented by a single scalar. I repeat this again. This is the happy point, a matrix becomes a scalar. What can be simpler than a scalar value. But, this is only possible when the matrix S's columns are independent. Because S^{-1} must be exist. Now I come back to my first question. Is the λ's multiplicity related with the number of eigenvectors? This time I found this has the name. Geometric multiplicity (GM): the number of in...

Tezuka Osamu's Black Jack, "Shrinking"

I like several novel authors. My first favorite author is probably Teduka, Osamu. I still love him. The list grows by adding Hoshi, Shinichi, Agatha Christie, Hermann Hesse, and so forth. My first favorite article of Tezuka was Atom as most of the (boy's) Tezuka fans did. But my favorite is Black Jack. I try to summarize one story, it is still quite vivid in my memory. I first read this story when I was 13 - 15 years old. I re-read it at least several times since Black Jack is composed of many short episodes. The title should be "ちぢむ (SHRINKING)" or it might be "縮む(Shrinking)". (It is not so convenient to translate this to English, since English does not have a system to say the exact same word in several ways. So I just simulate it with capital letters.) Black Jack is a genius surgeon, but he does not have the license. In short, his medical activity is illegal. His skill is top level in the world, but, the fee is also out-of-law expensive. In the story ...