Skip to main content

Eigenvalue and transfer function (2)

Scalar, vector, and function

Scalar

When I want to mention a quantity, I use numbers. A number always represents ``something.'' For example, if I said 130, what is this number means? The number itself has not so much meaning. This could be someone is 130cm tall, or Autobahn's speed limit is 130km/hour.  One number represent ``something'' e.g., ``tall cm'', ``speed limit km/hour.''  Figure 1 shows this. These single numbers are Scalers. It is just a number, why it has a special name Scalar? I think this is just for distinguishing a scalar and a vector (or a (complex) number).



Figure 1 Scalar has some meaning


Vector

There are many stuffs I can not represent with a scalar. For instance, a place. The distance from my apartment to Zoo station can be represented by a scalar value. But, if you need a direction, I can't tell it by a scalar value. I could say, 50 degree from the north in clockwise direction, the distance is 5 km. Or go north 3 km and then go to 4km east. However, I can not tell you it by a single scalar value. In this case, a single scalar value is not enough and we should use many scalar values to express these entities. For example, if I want to record someone's ``tall'', ``weight'', ``current body temperature'', and ``blood pressure.'' Figure 2 shows such example.  The astute reader realized ``How can I put different kind of stuffs at the same axis?'' Here I showed hight and weight, they have apparently different units. (Although, in my school, we add the credit of math, gymnastics, and English. We did such an outrageous without any doubt. Therefore, one might not care about this, though, I think you should know this is a dangerous operation.) This is actually no problem if it is a vector. A vector is a sequence of scalars. For instance, we use two scalars to represent a position. They are an angle and a distance. These have also different unit. The problem occurs when you operate (plus, minus, multiply, dot product...) the vectors. Of course we can not add angle and distance. But, if we don't do such operation, these vectors still have some meaning.

Here I use [] to indicate this is a vector and put some number sequence. For example, [170 70 36 120] is a vector that has 4 scalars. The order of the scalars is important.

Figure 2 Vector is a series of scalar


Next I would like to talk about a relationship between vector and function. The relationship between scalar and vector seems well known. But the relationship between vector and function might not be known well. (I remember that I learned this in a Fourier transformation class.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why parallelogram area is |ad-bc|?

Here is my question. The area of parallelogram is the difference of these two rectangles (red rectangle - blue rectangle). This is not intuitive for me. If you also think it is not so intuitive, you might interested in my slides. I try to explain this for hight school students. Slides:  A bit intuitive (for me) explanation of area of parallelogram  (to my site, external link) . 

Geometric Multiplicity: eignvectors (2)

If eigenvectors of a matrix A are independent, it is a happy property. Because the matrix A can be diagonalized with a matrix S that column vectors are eigenvectors of A . For example, Why this is a happy property of A? Because I can find A's power easily. A^{10} is not a big deal. Because Λ is a diagonal matrix and power of a diagonal matrix is quite simple. A^{10} = SΛ^{10} S^{-1} Then, why if I want to compute power of A ? That is the same reason to find eigenvectors. Eigenvectors are a basis of a matrix. A matrix can be represented by a single scalar. I repeat this again. This is the happy point, a matrix becomes a scalar. What can be simpler than a scalar value. But, this is only possible when the matrix S's columns are independent. Because S^{-1} must be exist. Now I come back to my first question. Is the λ's multiplicity related with the number of eigenvectors? This time I found this has the name. Geometric multiplicity (GM): the number of in...

Tezuka Osamu's Black Jack, "Shrinking"

I like several novel authors. My first favorite author is probably Teduka, Osamu. I still love him. The list grows by adding Hoshi, Shinichi, Agatha Christie, Hermann Hesse, and so forth. My first favorite article of Tezuka was Atom as most of the (boy's) Tezuka fans did. But my favorite is Black Jack. I try to summarize one story, it is still quite vivid in my memory. I first read this story when I was 13 - 15 years old. I re-read it at least several times since Black Jack is composed of many short episodes. The title should be "ちぢむ (SHRINKING)" or it might be "縮む(Shrinking)". (It is not so convenient to translate this to English, since English does not have a system to say the exact same word in several ways. So I just simulate it with capital letters.) Black Jack is a genius surgeon, but he does not have the license. In short, his medical activity is illegal. His skill is top level in the world, but, the fee is also out-of-law expensive. In the story ...