Skip to main content

Why I wrote a blog of ``A personal annotations of Veach's thesis.''

This is not a story about paper/mathematics/computer science, this is my story and I will be happy if you could find something interesting.

Finally today (2010-9-15(Wed)), I finished the Veach's thesis. This is one of the best papers I've ever read. I have still many questions, but, I hope I got the main ideas. This is not exactly a paper of my area, but this is related with the basic technology I work on. My colleagues recommended me this paper. I partially read it last April and found it interesting, though, I did not continue until June.

Our customers use our library, so our customers are developers. My task is helping them. When I joined the company, I worked as a developer for around two years. I was lucky to have a talented colleague and a great boss. It was fun to contribute a product. Our team had a success in 2008, for example, our optimizer made our other product more than 10 times faster. We had a demo in summer. But, at 2008 fall, the crisis came. My team just had a product, therefore, no customer yet. The company decided that no customers, no department. I was a bit sad, but also understandable. We built a new department that concentrate to care the customers and I was assigned to that department. First I even could not speak customers directory. But, now my responsibility becomes larger and I assign some tasks to others and talk with the customers. In one project, I had a full responsibility and I even managed our managers. It turns out I could do this well. But, I realized that I hardly solved technical problems.

I like to solve technical problems. Actually, that was the reason I chose this company. When I realized it, I was not happy anymore. This is a problem. That's my area -- solving a problem. I made a plan to solve the problem, and started to execute it. First I talked with my boss, my current boss is also a nice boss and he understands the situation. Then, I asked a meeting with the upper management. I made a presentation and asked development tasks. I asked a few possibilities to join one of our development teams. One of the answers is that I am not good enough to join the team. It is true, I have not so much experience yet, but I want to have a new challenge. I said I tried to learn, though they think that I might achieve nothing in five to ten years. That sounds an interesting challenge. I like challenges. Now you see, why I read the Veach's paper as my first project. This is one of the projects to make me more useful for the company. Here we have many specialists, I just ask them questions and I can easily get the answers as you have seen in my blog. This environment is great for learning. I also study some more topics now.

Veach's paper is comprehensive and complete. It is fun to read such paper. Some of the mathematics are familiar with me, and some I learned. Today, I am happy that I can keep my word.


Acknowledgements

I thank all my friends who answered my stupid questions. I also thank their great patience. Some of them I recorded in this blog, as ``A personal annotations of Veach's thesis''. I will continue to write some more summary about the paper.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why parallelogram area is |ad-bc|?

Here is my question. The area of parallelogram is the difference of these two rectangles (red rectangle - blue rectangle). This is not intuitive for me. If you also think it is not so intuitive, you might interested in my slides. I try to explain this for hight school students. Slides:  A bit intuitive (for me) explanation of area of parallelogram  (to my site, external link) . 

Geometric Multiplicity: eignvectors (2)

If eigenvectors of a matrix A are independent, it is a happy property. Because the matrix A can be diagonalized with a matrix S that column vectors are eigenvectors of A . For example, Why this is a happy property of A? Because I can find A's power easily. A^{10} is not a big deal. Because Λ is a diagonal matrix and power of a diagonal matrix is quite simple. A^{10} = SΛ^{10} S^{-1} Then, why if I want to compute power of A ? That is the same reason to find eigenvectors. Eigenvectors are a basis of a matrix. A matrix can be represented by a single scalar. I repeat this again. This is the happy point, a matrix becomes a scalar. What can be simpler than a scalar value. But, this is only possible when the matrix S's columns are independent. Because S^{-1} must be exist. Now I come back to my first question. Is the λ's multiplicity related with the number of eigenvectors? This time I found this has the name. Geometric multiplicity (GM): the number of in...

Tezuka Osamu's Black Jack, "Shrinking"

I like several novel authors. My first favorite author is probably Teduka, Osamu. I still love him. The list grows by adding Hoshi, Shinichi, Agatha Christie, Hermann Hesse, and so forth. My first favorite article of Tezuka was Atom as most of the (boy's) Tezuka fans did. But my favorite is Black Jack. I try to summarize one story, it is still quite vivid in my memory. I first read this story when I was 13 - 15 years old. I re-read it at least several times since Black Jack is composed of many short episodes. The title should be "ちぢむ (SHRINKING)" or it might be "縮む(Shrinking)". (It is not so convenient to translate this to English, since English does not have a system to say the exact same word in several ways. So I just simulate it with capital letters.) Black Jack is a genius surgeon, but he does not have the license. In short, his medical activity is illegal. His skill is top level in the world, but, the fee is also out-of-law expensive. In the story ...